Triple Talaq is a Legally valid form of Divorce – Madras HC

Comments : A woman named A.S. Parveen Akthar, contended that her husband had pronounced triple talaq on her and re married. She also contended that she was ill-treated in various ways and demands of dowry were made. After the Triple Talaq her husband had re married.

She file a writ petition and sought that that Section  2  of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 in so far  as  it  seeks  to recognise  and  validate Talaaq-ul-Biddat or Talaaq-i-Badai form of divorce (be declared) as void and unconstitutional.

The Madras HC says that “..The  prayer made in the writ petition, therefore, cannot be granted.  The writ petition is dismissed…”, basically saying Triple Talaq is a Legally valid form of Divorce

HC judgement :

talaq-is-a-valid-form-of-divorce-madras-hc-parveen-akthar-vs-uoi-and-others1

7 thoughts on “Triple Talaq is a Legally valid form of Divorce – Madras HC

  1. sabitha

    HC judge has much better brains than the idoits who are arguing.

    Gender bias can not be nuetralized by yet again another gender bias. you fools.

    Invent new law, to invent more criminals.

    You could not catch male criminals who are ruining innocent wifes, so you are creating female criminals against innocent husbands.

    In the hands of criminals always the innocent suffer.

    Like

    Reply
  2. khaji

    When a community has certain rules and founded on certain principles and those principles can not be understood to the logic people try to argue.

    If you say judge is not god, he can never punish any human being.

    If you say under law he can punish, the law is invented by only human.

    But if you believe the people who are bound by a holy quran for their good we need to respect the community and their beliefs and let them live.

    Men are not born out of men, Men also have sisters and daughters. Muslim men respect their woman very highly. Meterialistic people can see cultural differences and comment harsh on muslims, should be restrained.

    Like

    Reply
  3. jacob

    dear vinayak…..honourable high court judge is not GOD…..he too makes mistakes and they too are corrupt at the core…sill there is an appellate authority …balamurgan is obsolutely correct……..jacob…coimbatore

    Like

    Reply
  4. vinayak Post author

    Dear Mr. Balamurugan, Advocate :

    I’ve posted the view of the Honourable HC of Judicature at Madras !!!!

    How is that you are calling this a serious problem ????

    It’s NOT my view or your view being debated here !!!.

    Please respect the highest court of TN

    regards
    Vinayak

    Like

    Reply
  5. s.Balamurugan

    Trible talaq used by muslim men as male chavanistic weapon against women. The holy book of muslim qurran did not expressed as now days muslim men used the same against women. it gives freedom to divorce but always women became victim. when muslim women fight her legal right of maintance against her husband in the court man expressed trible talaq through letter and other forms. it is serious problem . we democrtic citizen we support geniune grivences of muslims in secular view. but we cannot accept let throw the women without any social security.
    —–s.Balamurugan advocate.pucl—-

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment