Monthly Archives: September 2013

husband returns home aftr 5 days, sees man run out of house, kills wife in anger !! police arrest husband after search !!

  • Krishnamoorthy a fisherman returned home after five days fishing trip
  • His wife Nadiya (24) , married for long and a mother of three kids, did NOT open the house door inspite of a long delay
  • Krishnamoorthy started hitting on the house door, when suddenly a man emerged from the home, pushed away krishnamoorthy and ran away
  • Shocked by this, Krishnamorrthy asked his wife who the man was and what was he doing in their home
  • It is alleged that the angered Krishnamoorthy, killed Nadia, by strangling her
  • He left Nadia’s body in the house and ran away with his three children
  • Police have arrested Krishnamoorthy after some search !!

******************************************************

வாலிபருடன் தனியாக இருந்ததால் கொலை – கணவன் வாக்குமூலம்!

செவ்வாய், 24 செப்டம்பர் 2013( 09:21 IST )

Share on twitterMore Sharing Services Webdunia

எர்ணாவூரில் 3 குழந்தைகளின் தாய் மர்மச்சாவு வழக்கில் வேறு வாலிபருடன் தனியாக இருந்ததால் மனைவியை கணவனே கழுத்தை நெரித்து கொலை செய்ததாக கைது செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளார்.

எர்ணாவூர் சுனாமி குடியிருப்பு 48-வது பிளாக்கில் வசித்து வருபவர் கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்தி. மீனவர். இவரது மனைவி நதியா (வயது 24). இவர்களுக்கு 3 குழந்தைகள் உள்ளனர்.

நேற்று முன்தினம் நதியா பலத்த காயங்களுடன் வீட்டில் உள்ள குளியலறையில் பிணமாக கிடந்தார். கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்தி 3 குழந்தைகளுடன் தலைமறைவாகி விட்டார். இதுகுறித்து நதியாவின் தாய் காந்தா கொடுத்த புகாரின் பேரில் எண்ணூர் போலீஸ் இன்ஸ்பெக்டர் ஆனந்த் வழக்குப்பதிவு செய்து கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்தியை சந்தேகத்தின் பேரில் தேடி வந்தார்.

கோவளம் கடற்கரையில் குழந்தைகளுடன் நின்று கொண்டிருந்த கிருஷ்ணமூர்த்தியை போலீசார் மடக்கிப்பிடித்து போலீஸ் நிலையம் கொண்டு வந்து விசாரித்தனர். அப்போது அவர் மனைவியை கழுத்தை நெரித்து கொலை செய்ததை ஒப்புக்கொண்டார்.

இதனையடுத்து அவரை போலீசார் கைது செய்தனர்.

போலீசாரிடம் அவர் கொடுத்துள்ள வாக்குமூலத்தில் கூறியிருப்பதாவது:

“நான் கடந்த 5 நாட்களுக்கு முன்பு மீன்பிடிப்பதற்காக கடலுக்கு சென்றேன். மீன்பிடித்து விட்டு நேற்று முன்தினம் இரவு 1 மணியளவில் வீட்டிற்கு வந்து கதவை தட்டினேன். நீண்டநேரமாக கதவு திறக்கவில்லை.

சிறிதுநேரம் கழித்து என் மனைவி வந்து கதவை திறந்தார். அப்போது ஒரு வாலிபர் என்னை கீழே தள்ளி விட்டுவிட்டு ஓடி விட்டான். அவன் யார்? என்று கேட்டு மனைவியிடம் தகராறு செய்தேன். ஏற்கனவே அவளது நடத்தையில் சந்தேகம் இருந்ததால் ஆத்திரம் தலைக்கேறியது.

உடனே அருகில் கிடந்த நைலான் கயிறை எடுத்து அவள் கழுத்தில் போட்டு இறுக்கி கொன்றேன். பிணத்தை குளியலறையில் இழுத்து போட்டு விட்டு குழந்தைகளை கூட்டிக்கொண்டு திருவான்மியூரில் உள்ள உறவினர் வீட்டிற்கு சென்று விட்டேன். பின்னர், எங்கு செல்லலாம் என்று தெரியாமல் கோவளம் கடற்கரையில் நின்று கொண்டிருந்தேன். அப்போது போலீசார் என்னை பிடித்து விட்டனர்.

இவ்வாறு அவர் கூறியுள்ளார்.

http://tamil.webdunia.com/newsworld/news/tnnews/1309/24/1130924005_2.htm

***********************************************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases

regards

Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn’t given up, Male, activist

ALLEGED murder threats to wife, 2 arrested. Marriage 1+ year, police already inside home !!! Don’t ask me about high court after high court decreeing that people should NOT be arrested in 498a cases without the sanction of the highest officers !!!!

Ariyalur : Tamil Nadu : Sep 29 , 2013

  • Two people including the husband have been arrested and four others have absconded in a case of alleged murder threats to the wife
  • Arul Ganeshan (27), son of Paramasivam from Rayapuram village near Senthurai, Ariyalur District was married to Rajeshwari (21) from the same place approx 1.5 years ago
  • It is alleged that Arul Ganeshan had misbehaved with his wife under the influence of liquour
  • It is also alleged that he tortured the wife for Dowry
  • Due to the differences between the couple, Rajeshwari had left her husband and gone back to her parental house
  • As things stood thus, on July 16th 2013, Rajeshwari and her relatives reached Arul Ganesha’s house for discussions
  • It is alleged that Arul Ganeshan, his elderly mother, father and relatives attacked Rajeshwari
  • So Rajeshwari filed a police complaint with the all woman’s police station
  • Police have registered a case
  • Also, Police have arrested Arul Ganeshan (husband) , Mahendran (relative)
  • Four others have absconded and police are searching for them as well
  • readers, please don’t ask me about high court after high court decreeing that people should NOT be arrested in 498a cases without the sanction of the highest officers !!!! ….this IS the fate of matrimony in India

பெண்ணுக்கு கொலை மிரட்டல் கணவன் உள்ளிட்ட இருவர் கைது

பதிவு செய்த நாள் : செப்டம்பர் 29,2013,03:13 IST

அரியலூர்: அரியலூர் அருகே பெண்ணுக்கு கொலை மிரட்டல் விடுத்த வழக்கில் கணவன் உள்ளிட்ட இருவர் கைது செய்யப்பட்டனர்.

அரியலூர் மாவட்டம், செந்துறை அருகே ராயம்புரம் கிராமத்தை சேர்ந்த பரமசிவம் மகன் அருள் கணேசன், 27. இவருக்கும் அதே ஊரை சேர்ந்த ராஜேஸ்வரி, 21, என்ற பெண்ணுக்கும் கடந்த ஒன்றரை ஆண்டுக்கு முன் திருமணம் நடந்தது. திருமணம் ஆன நாள் முதல் குடிபோதையி ல் வீட்டுக்கு வந்த அருள் கணேசன், தனது மனைவிடம் தகராறு செய் து, வரதட்சணைக் கேட்டு கொடு மை படுத்தி வந்தார். இதனால் மனமுடைந்த ராஜேஸ்வரி கடந்த சில மாதங்களுக்கு முன் பிறந்த வீட்டுக்குச் சென்று விட்டார்.

இதை தொடர்ந்து ராஜேஸ்வரி 2013 ஜூலை 16ம் தேதியன்று, அவரது அப்பா, அம்மா ஆகியோருடன் கணவன் வீட்டுக்கு சென்று நியாயம் கேட்டார்.

இரண்டு தரப்பினருக்கும் இடையே வாய் தகராறு அதிகமாகியது. ஆத்திரமடைந்த அருள் கணேசன் தனது பெற்றோர் உதவியுடன் மனைவி ராஜேஸ்வரியை தலைமுடியை பிடித்து இழுத்து தாக்கி சித்ரவதை செய்து, கொலை மிரட்டல் விடுத்தார்.

இதுபற்றி தனது கணவர் அருள் கணேசன், மாமனார் பரமசிவம், மாமியார் பானுமதி, அவரது உறவினர்களான அருள்மொழி, விஸ்வநாதன், மகேந்திரன் உள்ளிட்ட ஆறு பேர் மீதும், ராஜேஸ்வரி அரியலூர் அனைத் து மகளிர் போலீஸ் ஸ்டேஷனி ல் புகார் கொடுத்தார். அதன்மீது மூவர் மீதும் வழக்கு பதிந்த அனைத்து மகளிர் போலீஸார், அருள் கணேசன், மகேந்திரன் உள்ளிட்ட இருவரை கைது செய்துள்ளனர். மேலும் தலைமறைவாக உள்ள நான்கு பேரையும் தேடி வருகின்றனர்.

http://www.dinamalar.com/news_detail.asp?id=815075

*****************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases

regards

Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn’t given up, Male, activist

Wife Taunting hubby for ‘..not being smart ..’ is cruelty: Family Court Saves man after 10 year marriage !!!

“……..Whenever the petitioner (husband) returned from office tired and wanting to sleep, the respondent used to crave for physical relations and, on refusal, call petitioner chhakka (eunuch), unnecessarily making comments… The respondent (wife) had also taunted him, saying she wanted a better and smart husband from an affluent family. All this… amounts to mental cruelty to him.”

********************************************

Taunting hubby for not being smart is cruelty: Court

Monday, Sep 30, 2013, 8:13 IST | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA

Pic for representational purpose. Pic for representational purpose. – Ravi Jadhav/DNA

If a woman repeatedly taunts her husband for not being up to the mark, it amounts to mental cruelty, the family court said while granting divorce to a man who was married for over 10 years.

The court said, “Whenever the petitioner (husband) returned from office tired and wanting to sleep, the respondent used to crave for physical relations and, on refusal, call petitioner chhakka (eunuch), unnecessarily making comments… The respondent (wife) had also taunted him, saying she wanted a better and smart husband from an affluent family. All this… amounts to mental cruelty to him.”

Petitioner’s advocate Paresh Desai said, “The court took into account that the husband had done his best to provide a good life to the wife but the woman’s nature caused a lot of harassment to the husband, who was left with no choice but to seek divorce.”

As per the husband’s petition, the couple married in 2003 and they have two children. It was alleged that the wife would pick fights with the husband and his mother and never took good care of the children. The court also took into account the instances where the wife threatened to commit suicide as mental cruelty to the husband.

Denying all the allegations, the wife moved an application seeking the restitution of conjugal rights. The family court attempted a reconciliation but it didn’t work out, forcing the court to hear and decide upon the petition.

The court also accepted video recordings of the couple’s arguments. The bench said, “Though she was aware the arguments were being recorded, she used the most abusive and insulting words against her husband. She also threatened him for creating a scene and destroying her life…”

http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/1895796/report-taunting-hubby-for-not-being-smart-is-cruelty-court

*******************************************************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases

regards

Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn’t given up, Male, activist

men claiming income in ‘lakhs’ will be scr3w3d with BIG maint !! 60000 pm maint sought from minister’s son !! : “..They had submitted a pay slip of a private company where Rajashree claimed to have been working and it was mentioned that he was drawing Rs 1,65,000 per month. ….”

"…..a maintenance case seeking Rs 60,000 per month towards her study and other expenditures had been filed. The petition was lodged on the basis of the claims made by the Mohanty family while obtaining the conditional bail from the court of District and Sessions judge of Balasore……."

"………..“They had submitted a pay slip of a private company where Rajashree claimed to have been working and it was mentioned that he was drawing Rs 1,65,000 per month. Besides, they denied to have demanded dowry citing that Rajashree was earning Rs 10 lakh more per annum from his hotel business and landed properties, apart from his salary. Basing on the claims, we have demanded Rs 60,000 per month towards maintenance,” ………"

******************************************

Dowry harassment: Maintenance case filed against ex-minister’s son

By Hemanth Kumar Rout | ENS – BALASORE

Published: 28th September 2013 03:47 PM

Last Updated: 28th September 2013 03:47 PM

  • Photos
  • Rajashree Mohanty and Barsa Swony Choudhury (File/Express)
    Rajashree Mohanty and Barsa Swony Choudhury (File/Express)

In a significant development in the sensational dowry harassment case of Barsa Swony Choudhury (23) in which a former minister of Odisha and his family members were arrested earlier this year, a maintenance case has been filed in the Balasore family court against the woman’s husband Rajashree Mohanty.

Rajashree, his father, former minister and BJD MLA from Basta Raghunath Mohanty and mother Pritilata Mohanty are now on condition bail. They were arrested following the dowry torture allegation by Barsa, a resident of Bhoisahi here, in Balasore town police station on March 14.

Barsa’s counsel Amar Ballav Nanda confirmed that a maintenance case seeking Rs 60,000 per month towards her study and other expenditures had been filed. The petition was lodged on the basis of the claims made by the Mohanty family while obtaining the conditional bail from the court of District and Sessions judge of Balasore.

“They had submitted a pay slip of a private company where Rajashree claimed to have been working and it was mentioned that he was drawing Rs 1,65,000 per month. Besides, they denied to have demanded dowry citing that Rajashree was earning Rs 10 lakh more per annum from his hotel business and landed properties, apart from his salary. Basing on the claims, we have demanded Rs 60,000 per month towards maintenance,” Nanda said adding that the case has been registered.

Meanwhile, Barsa has been shifted to Bhubaneswar and studying MBA in HR and Finance in a private management college there. Her father Kishore Kumar Choudhury hoped the court would decide in their favour while granting the amount as per the legal provisions which would definitely help for her higher studies.

Barsa said after the case was registered she has been staying along with her parents and depending on her father’s income. "I require more money for my higher studies. That’s why I have filed the maintenance case and the money I expect to get will meet my study expenses," she added.

While after the incident, Raghunath had to lose his ministerial berth and the vice-president post of BJD, the ruling party too lost miserably in the recently concluded Jaleswar NAC election. Incidentally, Raghunath was projecting his son as the party’s candidate from Jaleswar constituency in 2014 Assembly polls.

Earlier, Barsa had moved the High Court, seeking cancellation of bail granted to her husband Rajashree and father-in-law by the lower courts. In her petition, she had alleged that Raghunath and Rajashree had violated the conditions imposed on them by the lower courts while granting bail.

Rajashree however could not be contacted for comment. His counsel Niranjan Panda told media persons that Rajashree lost his job after his arrest and he had no such hotel business. "When he earns nothing, how can he pay such a huge amount? However, we are yet to receive the notice. We would fight the case accordingly," he added.

*****************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases

regards

Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn’t given up, Male, activist

should BAIL be based on what a WITNESS says ?? or based on liberty of individual, severity of offence etc etc ???

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ORDER

IN S.B. Cr. Misc. 2nd Bail Application No.1564/2013
Indraraj alias Guddu Vs. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor

Date of Order ::: 19.09.2013

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq Shri Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, counsel for petitioner Shri Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, Public Prosecutor http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/

***************************

By the Court:-
The first bail application of petitioner, being Bail Application No.2539/2012, was dismissed by this court vide order dated 28.03.2012 with direction to trail court to conclude the trail at the earliest and petitioner was given liberty to again apply for bail before the court below itself after statements of key prosecution witnesses are recorded. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ;
https://vinayak.wordpress.com/

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that though statements of key prosecution witnesses have been record, but they have deposed against the accusedpetitioner.
This second bail application is accordingly dismissed on merits as the key prosecution witnesses have deposed against the accused-petitioner. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/

(Mohammad Rafiq) J

*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF – Save Indian Family Foundation. SIF is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.

******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE
******************************************************************

*****************

FOLLOW http://twitter.com/ATMwithDick on twitter or https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ on wordpress or http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ FOR 100s of high court and supreme court cases

regards

Vinayak
Father of a lovely daughter, criminal in the eyes of a wife, son of an compassionate elderly mother, old timer who hasn’t given up, Male, activist