January 17, 2009
August 23, 2008
Foreign Divorce Decrees – Balasubramaniam Huhan Vs T Hemapriya
Admissibility of Foreign Divorce Decrees – Balasubramaniam Huhan Vs T Hemapriya
foreign-divorce-decrees-balasubramaniam-guhan-vs-t-hemapriya
1991 SCR (2) 821 1991 SCC (3) 451 – narasimha rao and others Vs Venkata Lakshmi
Admissibility of foreign Divorce Decrees
1991 SCR (2) 821 1991 SCC (3) 451 – narasimha rao and others Vs Venkata Lakshmi
1991-scr-_2_-821-1991-scc-_3_-451-narasimha-rao-and-others-vs-venkata-lakshmi
August 22, 2008
DV act – respondent cannot be a woman, orders against women as respondents can be quashed
DV act – respondent cannot be a woman, orders against women as respondents can be quashed
dv-act-respondent-cannot-be-a-woman-orders-against-women-as-respondents-can-be-quashed
DV act a beneficient piece of legislation !!
DV act a beneficient piece of legislation !!
no quash if magistrate handling DV case erred in procedure
no quash if magistrate handling DV case erred in procedure
how NOT to file an quash in a DV case or how to screw up your own quash !!
how NOT to file an quash in a DV case or how to screw up your own quash !!
Judgment :
how-not-to-file-an-quash-in-a-dv-case-or-how-to-screw-up-your-own-quash
DV Act – court to funish order copies at the time of reading out the order
DV Act – court to funish order copies at the time of reading out the order.doc
Ref URL below
dv-act-court-to-funish-order-copies-at-the-time-of-reading-out-the-order
In spite of Hubby filing RCR and wife refusing to join him, deserting wife gets relief under DV act
In spite of Hubby filing RCR and wife refusing to join him, deserting wife gets relief under DV act
No use in saying they were separated since 2004 and met only in courts !!, wife still gets relief under DV in year 2007
more at
no-use-in-filing-rcreven-wife-refusing-to-join-hubby-gets-relief-under-dv-act
