Category Archives: fake dowry case

UK based NRI arrested & old parents booked as his wife claimed “..beating for dowry..” 15 years after marriage :-( :-(

Married in 2003, with two kids aged 9 and 5, this NRI couple return to India for holidays. Wife files complaint to get entire in law’s family behind bars just “claiming” she was beaten for dowry , even though they are married for approx 15 years !!!

source : TIMES OF INDIA

NRI & parents held for beating wife over dowry | Rajkot News

rajkot

RAJKOT: A non-resident Indian (NRI) man, based in London was arrested on Tuesday after his wife lodged a complaint against him and his parents, accusing them of demanding dowry, as well as of mental and physical harassment.

Police arrested Rakshit Gandhi (40), booked his father Arvind Gandhi and mother Sarla Gandhi at Mahila police station in Rajkot following the complaint lodged by Rakshit’s wife Rushita (39) early this month. According to case details, Rushita and Rakshit had married in 2003 and have two children — a nine-year-old son and a daughter aged five.

Soon after marriage, Rushita left for London to live with Rakshit, who worked in a finance firm there. She too started working in a firm there. Her in-laws, Arvind and Sarla, used to frequently visit the couple in London. Rushita alleged in her complaint that initially her husband and in-laws used to mentally harass her by demanding dowry.
Later, they also started abusing her and even assaulting her physically. She alleged that her husband had even seized her passport so that she could not return to India. Police said that Rushita has also claimed that Rakshit took away her salary and gave her minimum amount for daily expenses. He did not even allow her to speak to her parents over phone. Rushita also mentioned one incident when she was beaten up after Rakshit caught her talking to her parents over phone.

About a month ago, the couple and their children came to Rajkot. Soon after arriving, Rushita left her husband and went to stay with her parents on Yagnik Road on July 28. She later lodged a complaint with the mahila police against her husband and in-laws. She alleged that her in-laws have also usurped the money and jewellery that her parents had given at the time of the marriage.

On hearing about the complaint, Rakshit and her parents threatened to kill her if she did not take back her complaint. Police sub-inspector N S Savaniya, who is investigating the case, said that they have arrested Rakshit and will be arresting the other accused soon.

Fruit seller to soon become a #lawyer after being accused in #fake #dowry case that dragged and dragged

Fruit seller was accused of dowry case in 2012

case dragged and dragged

after a long time the fruit seller couldn’t take it anylonger

he’s on the way to becomming a lawyer !!

fruitseller becomes lawyer in uttrakand

TN GOVT fined 3 lakhs by TNHRC for Human rights violations, stripping husband naked, tying him to chains

Fined for stripping a husband naked, tying him to chains and detaining him and his mother based on #FAKE #DOWRY #CASE

GIST of news : PraveenKumar a dentist lives in Madurai, TN. As per his complaint with the TN HRC, His wife filed a fake Dowry case claiming there was a 3 lakhs dowry demand. The police inspector who received the complaint, increased it to 5 lakhs… later another inspector and head constable arrested PRaveenkumar and his mother (who is also a doctor), took them to police lockup, stripped Praveen kumar naked tied him to chains and tortured him.

Based on inquiry / trial, the TNHRC has ordered that the police have indulged in human rights violations and has ordered 3 lakhs compensation to the victim husband and mother in law

The compensation shall be paid by the TN Govt, but may be recovered from the police personnel who indulged in these inhuman torture

=========

போலி வரதட்சணை புகாரில் துன்புறுத்தல் தமிழக அரசுக்கு ரூ.3 லட்சம் அபராதம்
Added : ஏப் 06, 2018 01:39
சென்னை, போலி வரதட்சணை புகாரில், பல் டாக்டரின் குடும்பத்தினரை கைது செய்து துன்புறுத்திய வழக்கில், தமிழக அரசுக்கு, மூன்று லட்சம் ரூபாய் அபராதம் விதித்து, மாநில மனித உரிமைகள் ஆணையம் உத்தரவிட்டுள்ளது.மதுரை, அண்ணா நகரை சேர்ந்தவர் பிரவீன்குமார்; பல் டாக்டர். இவர், மாநில மனித உரிமைகள் ஆணையத்தில், தாக்கல் செய்த மனு:என் மனைவிக்கும், எனக்கும் கருத்து வேறுபாடு இருந்தது.அதனால், மூன்று லட்சம் ரூபாய் வரதட்சணை கேட்டு துன்புறுத்துவதாக, என் மீதும், என் தாயார் விஜயலட்சுமி மீதும், மதுரை தல்லாகுளம் மகளிர் காவல் நிலையத்தில், மனைவி சக்திதேவி பொய் புகார் அளித்தார்.அப்போதைய இன்ஸ்பெக்டர் நிர்மலா, அதை, ஐந்து லட்சம் ரூபாயாக மாற்றி, எங்கள் குடும்பத்தினரை மிரட்டினார்.இந்நிலையில், துாத்துக்குடி இன்ஸ்பெக்டர் நாகராஜ், எஸ்.ஐ., ஆதிலட்சுமி ஆகியோர், என் வீட்டுக்கு வந்து, என்னையும், டாக்டரான என் அம்மாவையும், துாத்துக்குடி காவல் நிலையத்துக்கு அழைத்து சென்றனர்.அங்கு நிர்வாணமாக்கி, என்னை சங்கிலியால் கட்டி வைத்து துன்புறுத்தினர். மனித உரிமை மீறலில் ஈடுபட்ட போலீசார் மீது, நடவடிக்கை எடுக்க வேண்டும்.இவ்வாறு மனுவில் கூறப்பட்டுள்ளது.இந்த வழக்கை விசாரித்த நீதிபதி, ஜெயச்சந்திரன் பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவு:ஆவணங்கள் மற்றும் சாட்சியங்களை பார்க்கும் போது, போலீஸ் அதிகாரிகள் நாகராஜன், நிர்மலா, ஆதிலட்சுமி ஆகியோர் மனித உரிமை மீறலில் ஈடுபட்டுள்ளது தெரிகிறது.எனவே, பாதிக்கப்பட்ட பிரவீன்குமார், அவரது தாயார் விஜயலட்சுமிக்கு, தலா, 1.50 லட்சம் ரூபாய் என, மூன்று லட்சம் ரூபாயை, நான்கு வாரத்திற்குள், தமிழக அரசு வழங்க வேண்டும்.இந்த பணத்தை மூன்று போலீசாரிடம் இருந்து வசூலித்து கொள்ளலாம்.இவ்வாறு உத்தரவில் கூறப்பட்டுள்ளது.

http://www.dinamalar.com/news_detail.asp?id=1994137

 

HC quashes dowry case against NRI brothers. Indian courts can’t hear matter if demand made abroad

Screenshot - 2_17_2018 , 11_13_47 AM

HC quashes dowry case against NRI brothers

Says Indian courts can’t hear the matter if demand for money is made abroad

Source : THE TRIBUNE, PUNJAB

Posted at: Feb 15, 2018, 1:23 AM; last updated: Feb 15, 2018, 1:23 AM (IST)

Saurabh Malik

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, February 14

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that dowry demand raised abroad can’t be tried by courts in India. The HC quashed a dowry harassment case against two NRI brothers, accused of instigating their brother to such a demand.

“In the instant case, even if there was instigation at the behest of the petitioners for demand of Rs 5 lakh from the complainant, the demand was raised outside the territorial jurisdiction of Bathinda. Therefore, the courts are not competent to entertain the matter,” Justice Jaishree Thakur ruled.

Justice Thakur said specific role, injury, dowry demand, entrustment of dowry articles, “istridhan” or its misappropriation was not attributed to the petitioners. “It is apparently clear that the FIR has been registered against the petitioners only to harass the family,” the judge added.

The ruling came on a bunch of two petitions filed against Punjab and other respondents by Rajesh Kumar Gupta and Rakesh Kumar Gupta through counsel RS Bajaj. They were seeking the quashing of an FIR dated July 14, 2012, registered at Kahnwan police station in Pathankot district under Sections 406, 498-A, 420 and 34 of the IPC. Directions were also sought for quashing all consequential proceedings. Bajaj told Justice Thakur’s Bench that the petitioners’ brother and the complainant got married in 2006. Subsequently, the parties resided together in England. No complaint was made during that time before the authorities there or during their annual visits to India. A perusal of the FIR also did not reveal that the petitioners attended the marriage ceremony; or that there was any entrustment of dowry articles.

After hearing Bajaj and going through the documents, Justice Thakur referred to the reply filed in the matter before observing that the petitioners were permanent residents of England and residing separately at a distance of 175 km from the complainant’s matrimonial home. “Even if, for the sake of argument, it is taken into account that the petitioners instigated their brother to raise a demand of Rs 5 lakh from the complainant, it was a demand that was raised in England, outside the territorial jurisdiction of the courts in Bathinda. Therefore, the offence, if any, had been committed in England,” Justice Thakur added.

Referring to a similar case before the Supreme Court, she said the parties were residing in Canada, but the FIR was registered in Jalandhar, alleging demand of dowry and misappropriation of dowry articles. “The proceedings were quashed, holding that the Jalandhar court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the matter,” she concluded.

 

 

#Bangalore and every metro has 1000s of #fakeDV #fake498s. Who will stop them ?

every metro including #bangalore has 10s of 1000s of #FakeDV #fake498a but no one cares a damn… 1000s of men and elders have died and NO one cares a fart. Hardly any #fakeCase female has been jailed. Now, Just One night, and for a few hours, some / few women were probably #molested and we have 1000s of MEN and WOMEN and Dozens of #presstitutes agonizing and Crying over that… All Indian men and All Bangaloreans are being tarnished … The police and government are all being pulled up …. How do you think MEN will get any justice or any equality in this country ??? When will our men wake up ? when oh when ??