IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 20.04.2015
CORAM THE HONOURABLE THIRU JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY
C.R.P.(PD)No.1634 of 2015
G.Sankaranarayanan … Petitioner
Sakthi Mangal @ Raja Rajeswari
Rep. By her Power of Attorney Agent,
Mr.Sundararaman, NO.10-A, Moraichin Street,
Near Railway Station,Puducherry…. Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the learned Family Judge, Puducherry for completing the M.O.P.No.172 of 2013 at an early date.
For Petitioner : Mr.Bharatha Chakaravarthy
O R D E R
The petitioner, who is the husband of the respondent, has filed the above Civil Revision Petition to direct the Family Court, Puducherry to dispose of the Original Petition in M.O.P.No.172 of 2013, within a stipulated time.
- The petitioner filed the Original Petition in M.O.P.No.172 of 2013 for divorce on the ground of cruelty.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the oral evidence on the side of the petitioner and the respondent was closed and the respondent has filed an application to reopen and recall P.W.1 for further examination, which application was also allowed by the Family Court. The learned counsel further submitted that since the original petition is pending for a long time, the petitioner is put to hardship and prejudice. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the Civil Revision Petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the Family Court, Puducherry to dispose of the Original Petition in M.O.P.No.172 of 2013 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With this observation, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.
Index : No
Internet : Yes
The Family Court,
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon or High court websites. Some notes are made by Vinayak. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog and if you are reading this on tumblr please post responses as comments at vinayak.wordpress.com . Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE with necessary Emphasis, Re formatting