ablaa takes 7.5lakhs & refuses mutual consent. Husband runs 2 HC who tells him 2 go file fresh case !

Lots of ppl ask us what is the format for mutual consent AFTER PAYMENT !! we safely tell them we have NO such format ! Here is a Taza case, decreed just 1 week ago, showing a harassed husband who has lost 7.5lakhs and is now running pillar to post ..sorry court to court after wife took the money and showed him the door

Again ladies and gentlemen, I am NOT making this up !!. This is all from reported Judgements of honourable courts !!

*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon or High court websites. Some notes are made by Vinayak. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog and if you are reading this on tumblr please post responses as comments at vinayak.wordpress.com . Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.
*******************************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE with necessary Emphasis, Re formatting
*******************************************************************************

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

F.A. No. 156 of 2014

*****************

Rajeev Ranjan Singh, S/o Sudarshan Singh, Qr. No.3062, Sector 12/B P.O & P.S. -Sector-12, B.S.City, District. Bokaro, Thro’ his father Sri Sudarshan Singh, Power of Attorney Holder ……….. ………..Appellant

Versus-

Shweta Kumari, W/o Rajeev Ranjan Singh, D/o Suresh Prasad Singh, Qr. No.- 1212, Sector 12F, PO&PS-Sector 12, B.S.City, Dist.Bokaro……….Respondent

*****************

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT

*****************

For the Appellant : Mr. Ram Ashray Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent : none

*****************

05/ Dated: 24th August, 2015

Per Virender Singh, C.J.:

1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant sub- mits that in fact the respondent-wife has deceived the appellant and took a clever turn by withdrawing from according consent to the mutual divorce after once agreeing to it, and setting the dispute for good after receiving a sum of Rs.7,50,000/-, vide two different drafts as one time permanent alimony and maintenance. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that those all settlements arrived at between the parties have been reduced into writing and both the sides had agreed to go ahead with a petition under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act.

3. Be that as it may, they all can be said to be a good ground for the appellant to move the court concerned once again seeking decree of divorce but not for the purposes of disturbing the impugned order.

4. Faced with this situation, counsel for the appellant states that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant appeal enabling the appellant-husband to file a fresh petition in the court concerned seeking decree of divorce on all the pleas available to him including the grounds taken herein.

5. Prayer acceded to.

6. Resultantly, the appeal, on hand, stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Virender Singh, C.J.) (P.P. Bhatt, J.) Anu/SI/LAK

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s