Stuck with delays in TEP ? No results from TEP ? Officers refusing TEP results ? use this case for time bound results
Give TEP investigation results to husband in four months !! Central Inf commission
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Room No. 308, B-Wing, August Kranti Bhaw
an, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066
File No. CIC/LS/A/2009/001067
Shri Manish Kumar
Public Authority –
Income Tax Department
(through : Shri Sukhbeer Chaudhary,
Addl. CIT and Shri Jagdish Chander
Date of hearing –
Date of Decision –
The matter is called for hearing toda y dated 04.03.2010. Appellant present. The Public Authority is represented by the officers named above. It is noticed that vide RTI application dated 12.5.2009, the appellant had sought information about the progress in the TEP filed by him against one Pawan Kumar. The CPIO had responded to it vide letter dated 11.6.2009. The first appeal was decided by the AA vide order dated 6.8.2009.
2. The present appeal is directed against the above orders.
3. During the hearing, the appellant would submit that he had filed TEP way back in April 2009 and despite lapse of a bout 10 months, no information about the progress made therein has been provided to him. On the other hand, Shri Sukhbeer Chaudhary would submit that the matter is under investigation and no progress therein can be intimated in terms of section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act.
4. It is to be noted that a similar issue had come up before the Commission in File No. CIC/L/A/2009/01014(Brij Balla b Singh –Vs- DG IT(Investigation), Lucknow) wherein the Commission had observed as follows :-
“3. Besides, it is also to be not ed that blank ban on disclosure of information regarding the action take n on tax evasion complaints may not always be in the best interest of the st ate revenues. In fact, it may dis-enthuse the information givers as information givers are generally keen to know whether the information provided by them has been of some value to the authorities or not. Feed back in this regard would motivate the information givers to provide further informations to the authorities and thereby enable them to curb tax evasion and enhance the state revenues. Viewed thus, despite the office of DGIT(Inv) being an exempted organization, it may not always be the best policy to deny some kind of feed back to the information givers.”
The ratio of above decision aptly applies in this case. The TEP may be true or false. In any case, the appellant is entitled to know the outcome thereof.
However, the full details of the investigation need not be disclosed as it would impede the process of investigation.
5. In view of the above discussion, the CP IO is hereby directed to disclose the broad outcome of the TEP to the appellant in 04 months time. It is, however, clarified that he need not disclose the details of investigation.
( M.L. Sharma )
Central Information Commissioner
Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against application and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO of this Commission.
Address of parties :
1. The Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax,
Circle 47(1) & CPIO, Room No. 426,
Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Circus,
2. Shri Manish Kumar,
C-6/342, Badan Street, Nr. Gole Park,