woman allgdly marries sister’s husband files 498A n husband, mothr n law, sistr n law! all run 4 quash

This is a classic. According to what we understand this woman filed a 498a etc, got a consent divorce from her hubby and married her own sister’s husband !!! Now the accused run to High court for quash of 498a, almost 10 years after the case !!

the Hon court states and we quote phraphrase
********
* … Hindu Marriage Petition … No.326 of 2001 … for a decree of divorce by mutual consent under the provisions of Section 13 Clause (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
* wife, on account of matrimonial dispute, gone to extent of levelling reckless allegations against her husband aged mother­ in­law and her sister­in­law.
* and then in 2003 i.e. two years after divorce petition files a 498a !!!!"…….First Information Report, registered as Inquiry Case No.258 of 2003 before the Fatehgunj Police Station, Vadodara for the offence punishable under Section 498­A read with Section 114 of the Indian Penal Code……."

the harassed husband states that she married her own sister’s husband after divorcing this guy !!

] Memorandum of Marriage which is registered, Darshanaben as well
] as her husband are shown to be divorcees. I further say that the
] bridegroom Patel Subhashchandra Umedbhai happens to be the
] husband of sister of Darshanaben and this I am saying by way of
] information which I have to the best of my knowledge.

*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon or High court websites. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF – Save Indian Family movement. SIF as a concept is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog and if you are reading this on tumblr please post responses as comments at vinayak.wordpress.com . Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.

******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE
******************************************************************

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9073 of 2003 With CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9423 of 2004

FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s