TWENTY FOUR BAILs in 1 day @ 1 HC alone. Imagine how many / yr, all over India & the money involved !!

* These TWENTY FOUR bail orders (all connected to 498A), were ordered by the Hon. Kolkatta HC, dated 25 Sep 2014 and were found on a casual search by this blogger.
* There may be many more such bail orders in this (Kolkatta) HC and there are bound to be many more all around the country.
* Consider Rs. 50,000 to 100,000 per bail order at HC level and work out the industry size !!!
* Some of these cases also involve 304B !!
* It is pertinent to note that even in cases where 304B is mentioned on the subject line, there is NO major discussion of the case… Just bail issued in a short order

**************** BAIL ORDER # 1 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Sofikul Molla @ Mallick & Ors vs State of west Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay

******************************************************************
Sl. No.479 ad C.R.M 9456 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 07.08.2014 in connection with Sonamukhi Police Station Case No. 25 of 2014 dated 26.03.2014 under Sections 498A/304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
******************************************************************

Mr. Achintya Kumar Banerjee, Sk. Faridullah   ………         For the petitioners
Mr. Madhusudan Sur ………          For the State
******************************************************************

The learned Advocate of the petitioners submits that in the present case three other co-accused persons including the husband of the victim have already been granted bail.

Heard the learned Advocate for the State. Having considered the materials in the case diary and also considering the fact that in the present case three other co-accused persons including the husband of the victim have already been granted bail, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 2 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Sunil Mondal & Anr vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
******************************************************************
Sl. No.453 ad C.R.M 13908 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.09.2014 in connection with Gaighata Police Station Case No. 28 of 2014 dated 09.01.2014 under Sections 498A/325/376/511/406/506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
******************************************************************

Mr. Surajit Basu   ………         For the petitioners
Ms. Sujata Das     ………         For the State
******************************************************************

Heard the learned Advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) only each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 3 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Bikash Bhattacharjee & Others vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
******************************************************************
C.R.M. 13799 of 2014 BD
Re: An application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 18th September, 2014 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No. 568/2014 dated 02.07.2014 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
******************************************************************

Mrs. Matan Chakraborty…. For Petitioners
Mrs. Kumkum Mitra. … For State
******************************************************************

Heard learned advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 4 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Suman Chakraborty & Another vs State of West Bengal
September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
******************************************************************
C.R.M. 13644 of 2014 BD
Re: An application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 18th September, 2014 in connection with Kharagpur (T) Police Station Case No. 375/2014 dated 15.07.2014 under Section 498A/313/325/406 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
******************************************************************

Mr. Malay Bhattacharya…. For Petitioners
Mrs. Kakali Chatterjee…. For State
******************************************************************

Heard learned advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 5 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Sital Mondal Vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Nishita Mhatre
******************************************************************
25.9.14 Court No.17 A.B.
CRM No. 13350 of 2014
In the matter of: An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 15.09.2014 in connection with Rampurhat P. S. Case No. 10 of 2014 dated 13.01.2014 under Sections 498A/304B/306 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
******************************************************************

Bitasok Banerjee For the Petitioner
Mr. Manjit Singh, Ld. P.P., Mr. Saryati Dutta For the State
******************************************************************

The Petitioner has applied for bail in respect of the aforesaid case. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties and have perused the case diary and other material on record. The Petitioner is the husband of the victim. He has been in custody for the last 59 days.

In our opinion, since the charge sheet has already been submitted there is no need to continue the Petitioner in custody.

Hence, we allow the application and direct that the Petitioner, Sital Mondal shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Chief wed Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat, upon furnishing a bond of `10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be a local surety.

The application for bail is, thus disposed of.

(Nishita Mhatre, J)

(Samapti Chatterjee, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 6 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Bulbuli Pal vs State of WEst Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
***************************************************************************

Sl. No.457 ad C.R.M 13929 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.09.2014 in connection with Katwa Police Station Case No. 190 dated 19.05.2014 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com
***************************************************************************
In the matter of :

Bulbuli Pal     ………                Petitioner
Vs
State of West Bengal

***************************************************************************
Mr. Navanil De, Sk. Samiul Haque……… For the petitioner
Mr. Sudip Ghosh, Mr. Sekhar Barman ……… For the State
***************************************************************************

The learned Advocate of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the married sister-in-law of the victim.

The learned Advocate of the petitioner further submits that in the present case charge sheet has already been submitted. The learned Advocate of the petitioner also submits that the husband of the victim has already been granted bail and other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail.

Heard the learned Advocate for the State. Having considered the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted and also considering the fact that husband of the victim has already been granted bail and other accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail, we are of the view that detention of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katwa and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 7 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Provash Ruidas vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Subhro Kamal Mukherjee
*********************************************************************
C.R.M. 12480 of 2014 ss.
In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on September 05, 2014 in connection with Bauria Police Station Case No. 109 of 2013 dated August 18, 2013 under Sections 498A/304B/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
*********************************************************************

Ms. Minoti Gomes, Ms. Manasi Roy …for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta …for the State.
*********************************************************************

Heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties.

The petitioner is seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences punishable under Sections 498A/304B/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioners that the accused/petitioner is in custody for 401 days and the investigation is complete. Therefore, further detention of the petitioner is not necessary.

Having considered the case diary and the materials on record and, particularly, when the petitioner is in custody for 401 days and the investigation is complete, we are of the opinion that further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary and he may be granted bail.

Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely, Provash Ruidas, be released on bail upon furnishing bond of ` 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only with two sureties of like amount, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Uluberia, District: Howrah, on condition that the petitioner shall attend the court on each and every occasion unless prevented by sufficient cause.

The application for bail is, thus, allowed.

(Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, J.)

(Asim Kumar Mondal, J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 8 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Asutosh Pradhan & Ors vs State of WEst Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************
Sl. No.450 ad C.R.M 13808 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.09.2014 in connection with Contai Police Station Case No. 26 of 2014 dated 04.07.2014 under Sections 498A/323/325/326/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Robiul Islam, Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra ………              For the petitioners
Ms. Sonali Das    ………        For the State
*********************************************************************

Heard the learned Advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) only each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 9 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Savana Bibi & Others vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************
C.R.M. 13024 of 2014 BD
Re: An application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 11th September, 2014 in connection with Chapra Police Station Case No. 321/2014 dated 03.05.2014 under Sections 498A/323/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Raju Mondal…. For Petitioners
Mr. Debabrata Dasgupta…. For State
*********************************************************************

Heard learned advocate of both the parties. Learned advocate of the petitioners submits that in the present case one other co-accused person has already been granted bail by the learned Court below.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and specially considering the fact that one other co-accused person has already been granted bail by the learned Court below, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 10 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Saiful Bapari vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************
C.R.M 13971 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.09.2014 in connection with Tufanganj Police Station Case No. 192 of 2014 dated 09.07.2014 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
*********************************************************************

Ms. Minati Gomes, Md. Hafiz Ali      ………           For the petitioner
Mr. Asit Nayek      ………         For the State
*********************************************************************

Heard the learned Advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 11 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Adrish Ghosh vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************
Sl. No.459 ad C.R.M 13900 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.09.2014 in connection with Raghunathganj Police Station Case No. 773 of 2014 dated 12.09.2014 under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Sandip Chakrabarty          ………            For the petitioner
Mr. Goutam Wilson         ………            For the State
*********************************************************************

Heard the learned Advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 12 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Hazrat Sk vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
****************************************************
C.R.M. 13049 of 2014 BD
Re: An application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 11th September, 2014 in connection with Beldanga Police Station Case No. 238/2014 dated 11.04.2014 under Section 498A/326/307 of the Indian Penal Code.
****************************************************

Ms. Kuntal Roy…. For Petitioner
Mrs. Purnima Ghosh…. For State
****************************************************

Heard learned advocate of both the parties. Learned advocate of the petitioner submits that other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and specially considering the fact that other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 13 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Sk. Fariad Hossain @ Raj vs State of West Bank
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

Sl. No.6 ad C.R.M 13739 of 2014
In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.09.2014 in connection with Contai Police Station Case No. 340 of 2014 dated 06.09.2014 under Sections 498A/324/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, Mr. Avinaba Patra ……… For the petitioner
Ms. Sujata Das ……… For the State
*********************************************************************

The petitioner is seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offence punishable Sections 498A/324/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The learned Advocate of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for last 20 days.

Heard the learned Advocate for the State. Having considered the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for last 20 days, we are of the opinion that further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary.

Therefore, the accused/petitioner namely, Sk. Fariad Hossain @ Raj be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand) only with one local surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Contai, Purba Medinipur.

The application for bail, thus, stands disposed of.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 14 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Bikash Bhattacharjee & Others vs state of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

C.R.M. 13799 of 2014 BD
Re: An application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 18th September, 2014 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No. 568/2014 dated 02.07.2014 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mrs. Matan Chakraborty…. For Petitioners
Mrs. Kumkum Mitra…. For State
*********************************************************************

Heard learned advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 15 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Gouri Fulmali vs Unknown on 25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

C.R.M. No. 11619 of 2014 MNS.
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on August 29, 2014 in connection with Mayureswar Police Station Case No. 142 of 2014 dated July 7, 2014 under Sections 498A/306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibitions Act.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Rajendra Banerjee …for the petitioner.
Ms. Sonali Das …for the State.
*********************************************************************

Allowed

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged occurrence and the petitioner is not even a part of the family of the husband of the victim. The learned advocate for the petitioner also submits that the husband of the victim has already been granted bail.

Heard the learned advocate for the State.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged occurrence and the petitioner is not even a part of the family of the husband of the victim and also considering the fact that that the husband of the victim has already been granted bail, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 16 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Sk. Rabiul & Others vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

C.R.M. 13778 of 2014 BD
Re: An application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 18th September, 2014 in connection with Panskura Police Station Case No. 499/2014 dated 14.09.2014 under Section 498A/323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Ramdulal Manna…. For Petitioners
Mr. Prasun Dutta…. For State
*********************************************************************

Heard learned advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 17 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Jabbar Mallick & Ors vs Unknown on 25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

Sl. No.466 ad C.R.M 9439 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 07.08.2014 in connection with Sonamukhi Police Station Case No. 25 of 2014 dated 26.03.2014 under Sections 498A/304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Achintya Kumar Banerjee, Sk. Faridullah   ………         For the petitioners
Mr. Madhusudan Sur ………         For the State
*********************************************************************

The learned Advocate of the petitioners submits that in the present case three other co-accused persons including the husband of the victim have already been granted bail.

Heard the learned Advocate for the State. Having considered the materials in the case diary and also considering the fact that in the present case three other co-accused persons including the husband of the victim have already been granted bail, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 18 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Sahidul Islam vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

C.R.M. 13798 of 2014 BD
Re: An application for bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 18th September, 2014 in connection with Falakata Police Station Case No. 822/2014 dated 05.09.2014 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Ms. Arijit Ghosh…. For Petitioners
Mrs. Sima Biswas…. For State
*********************************************************************

Heard learned advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees Three Thousand Only) each with one surety of like amount each to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 19 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Sk. Raju Hossain @ Sk. Sohel vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

(Bail Granted)
C. R. M. No. 11826 of 2014
In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 28.08.2014 in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No. 267 of 2014 dated 20.04.2014 under Sections 498A/376(2)(1)(h)/363/366 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. (G.R. Case No. 805 of 2014)
*********************************************************************

Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta … … for the Petitioner
Mr. Saryati Dutta … … for the State
*********************************************************************

Leave is granted to the learned Advocate-on-record of the petitioner to correct the section mentioned in the cause title of the Application for Bail.

The petitioner is seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences punishable under Sections 498A/376(2)(1)(h)/363/366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

The learned Advocate of the petitioner submits that the said petitioner is in custody for 118 days. The learned Advocate of the petitioner further submits that in the present case, investigation is complete and charge- sheet has been submitted.

Heard the learned advocate for the State. Having considered the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner herein is in custody for 118 days, we are of the opinion that further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary.

Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Sk. Raju Hossain @ Sk. Sohel, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only), with one local surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Medinipur at Tamluk.

The application for bail, thus, stands allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 20 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Abdus Sobur Gazi @ Abdus Sabur Gazi vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************
Sl. No.448 ad C.R.M 13862 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.09.2014 in connection with Swarupnagar Police Station Case No. 511 of 2014 dated 22.06.2014 under Sections 498A/323/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************
Mr. Suman Das Adhikary……… For the petitioner
Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy ……… For the State
*********************************************************************

Heard the learned Advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 21 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Subadra Gayen vs Unknown on 25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************
C.R.M. No. 13486 of 2014 MNS.
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on September 16, 2014 in connection with Kakdwip Police Station Case No. 454 of 2012 dated September 6, 2012 under Sections 498A/307/326/34 and adding Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Gurupada Das …for the petitioner.
Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Mr. Sekhar Barman …for the State.
*********************************************************************

Allowed Leave is granted to the learned advocate for the petitioner to correct the cause title of this application by adding Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the victim. The learned advocate for the petitioner also submits that in the present case investigation is complete and the chargesheet has already been submitted and the husband of the victim has already been granted bail.

Heard the learned advocate for the State.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and also considering the fact that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of the victim and further considering the fact that the investigation is complete and the chargesheet has already been submitted and also considering the fact that the husband of the victim has already been granted bail, we are of the view that detention of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Kakdwip, District- South 24 Parganas, and subject to conditions as laid down in sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia, J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 22 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Marjia Bibi & Ors vs Unknown on 25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

Sl. No.449 ad C.R.M 13811 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 19.09.2014 in connection with Nowda Police Station Case No. 28 of 2014 dated 30.01.2014 under Sections 498A/304B/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir………        For the petitioners
Mr. Madhusudan Sur       ………             For the State
*********************************************************************

The learned Advocate of the petitioners submits that in the present case charge sheet has already been submitted. The learned Advocate of the petitioners further submits that the father-in-law and the husband of the victim have already been granted bail.

Heard the learned Advocate for the State. Having considered the materials in the case diary and considering the fact that the charge sheet has already been submitted and also considering the fact that the father-in-law and the husband of the victim have already been granted bail, we are of the view that detention of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only each with two sureties of Rs.5,000/-(Rupees five thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Murshidabad at Berhampore and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 23 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Krishnapada Joardar vs Unknown on 25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************

Sl. No.444 ad C.R.M 12520 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 08.09.2014 in connection with Krishnagar Women Police Station Case No. 219 of 2014 dated 16.08.2014 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Atis Kumar Biswas ……… For the petitioner
Ms. Sima Biswas ……… For the State
*********************************************************************

Heard the learned Advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioner.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) only with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub-section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

http://evinayak.tumblr.com/ ; https://vinayak.wordpress.com/ ; http://fromvinayak.blogspot.com

**************** BAIL ORDER # 24 (no specific sequence ) *************
*********************************************************************

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side)
Gautam Das & Anr vs State of West Bengal
25 September, 2014
Author: Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay
*********************************************************************
Sl. No.454 ad C.R.M 13107 of 2014
In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 12.09.2014 in connection with Balurghat Police Station Case No. 642 of 2014 dated 25.08.2014 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
*********************************************************************

Mr. Siladitya Sanyal, Mr. Sovon Dasgupta, Mr. Sujan Chatterjee      ………            For the petitioners
Ms. Manasi Roy   ………        For the State
*********************************************************************

Heard the learned Advocate of both the parties. Having considered the materials in the case diary, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioners in this case is not necessary. There is also no apprehension of abscondence of the petitioners.

We are, therefore, inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) only each with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to conditions as laid down in sub- section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay,J.)

(Sudip Ahluwalia,J.)

*****************************disclaimer**********************************
This judgment and other similar judgments posted on this blog was / were collected from Judis nic in website and / or other websites of Govt. of India or other internet web sites like worldlii or indiankanoon or High court websites. Some notes are made by Vinayak. This is a free service provided by Vinayak (pen name). Vinayak is a member of SIF – Save Indian Family movement. SIF as a concept is committed to fighting FALSE dowry cases and elder abuse. SIF supports gender equality and a fair treatment of law abiding Indian men. Should you find the dictum in this judgment or the judgment itself repealed or amended or would like to make improvements or comments, please post a comment on the comment section of the blog or write to e _ vinayak @ yahoo . com (please remove spaces). Vinayak is NOT a lawyer and nothing in this blog and/or site and/or file should be considered as legal advise.

******************************************************************
CASE FROM JUDIS / INDIAN KANOON WEB SITE
******************************************************************

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s